Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(3): 1043-1052, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194092

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the ablation efficacy of transabdominal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA), to investigate whether the risk of damage to adjacent organs and endometrium due to this technique can be reduced or even avoided. We also evaluated the clinical efficacy of this technique in the treatment of uterine fibroids of different sizes and at different locations over a 24-month follow-up period. METHODS: This study included 50 patients with uterine fibroids who underwent transabdominal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided PMWA from August 2018 to July 2020. Lesions were confirmed by pathology. The technical efficacy and complications of PMWA were assessed. The lesion diameter, lesion volume, lesion location, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features before PMWA and within 24 h after PMWA were recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used for follow-up at 3 and 6 months after PMWA. Transvaginal ultrasound was used for follow-up at 24 months after PMWA. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients with uterine fibroids received treatment. The median ablation rate of uterine fibroids was 97.21%. The mean lesion volume reduction rates were 32.63%, 57.26%, and 92.64% at 3, 6, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. The size and location of uterine fibroids did not significantly affect the ablation rate and the rate of lesion volume reduction. No major complication was found during and after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided PMWA can be utilized to safely enhance the ablation rate while minimizing ablation time and avoiding harm to adjacent organs and the endometrium. This technique is applicable for treating uterine fibroids of different sizes and at varying locations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IPR-17011910, and date of trial registration: 08/07/2017.


Assuntos
Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade , Laparoscopia , Leiomioma , Neoplasias Uterinas , Feminino , Humanos , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Seguimentos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Leiomioma/patologia , Ultrassonografia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia
2.
Urology ; 126: 39-44, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30716343

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine and evaluate the value of shadowing and the twinkling artifact (TA) for the diagnosis of ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Related ultrasound images from 117 patients with suspected ureteral stones were consecutively collected with optimized machine settings, confirmed by computed tomography and then retrospectively reviewed by 12 physicians who were classified into 3 groups according to their experience levels: elementary, intermediate, and advanced. The shadowing/TA grades were separately evaluated by all the participating physicians in a blinded manner, and the consistency was verified using Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Furthermore, the diagnostic performance was compared among the groups stratified by physicians' clinical experience levels and ureteral stone sizes. RESULTS: Using shadowing/TA as indicators for ureteral stones, Kendall's W for the TA evaluation was higher than that for shadowing among all the participating physicians and subgroups (P <.05). Furthermore, with no difference in specificity at 100%, the sensitivity of the isolated TA was superior to that of shadowing in groups stratified by the physicians' clinical experience levels and stone sizes, respectively (P <.05). However, for the respective comparisons of shadowing and the TA among groups stratified by stone sizes, as ureteral stones became larger, the detection sensitivities all significantly increased (P ≤.001). CONCLUSION: Among physicians, subjective evaluation of the TA is more consistent and has better diagnostic sensitivity than that of shadowing for the diagnosis of ureteral stones, and the stone size may play an important role in the detection sensitivity of these 2 indicators.


Assuntos
Artefatos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Cálculos Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA